Land Management Planning capacity and expectations at a community level

Earlier this year i had the privilege of assisting the Bana Mindilji Aboriginal Corporation with action planning exercise for their country. The planning looked at their aspiration to manage their country and to develop a future for their people using the resources of the land and their culture.

The Bana Mindilji Corporation is a representative of Bama (people) of the hinterland area near Wujal Wujal north of the Daintree in North Queensland. They are Kuku Yalanji speaking people of the rainforest. They are made up of committed family groups that are high on aspirations and dreams but low on resources and capitol for the realisation of their aspirations.

It is from these position that many groups such as the Bana Mindilji start, their key aspirations as in all cases, is to look after country, to have a presence, to ensure culture is passed on to younger generations and importantly to share this with visitors to their country.

They realise the opportunities that exist within their country. It is on the verge of well known coastal tourist route that flows between the Daintree in the south to the Cooktown to the north. Importantly they realise the obligation that they have to look after their country and their role within this.

I want to use my experiences with Bana Mindilji to paint a picture of how it is for so many groups who want to play a role in looking after their country. Like so many groups the major issues they face is the demand for ongoing resources. Having the ability to constantly draw in the critical resources to maintain this role is the key aspect of the ongoing struggle. And for many groups such as this, it is a struggle. A struggle to maintain relationships and in some cases partnerships with governments at all levels, to meet the financial requirements and expectations that they set upon themselves are also major challenges.

They have some good people involved, however this is sometimes problematic, as it is these few people that carry the workload and as a result the expectations as well. These few people have skills and abilities and are able to meet the demands of such roles they take on. And the problem is that they often take on these roles in voluntary capacities. they still have to live and provide for their families and more often then not they are successful in these roles in mainstream jobs. What they do for their mobs is time they sacrifice themselves. Maintaining and keeping good people in community is a major issue. We all need to live and may need to move in order to find employment to do so. Move away from country and away from involvement in the broader community aspirations to look after country can often disjoint momentum.

Government has many regulations and there are key aspects of legislation that affect peoples aspirations to look after country. Maintaining this relationship is ongoing. Having the skills and experiences and foresight to manoeuvre through these process is a skill on its own and can take a fair amount of time, resources and energy.

Internal governance is another factor that also requires certain amount of attention. The cloud of "black politics" often hovers in the background and is dependant on good policies and communications. If left unattended this can cause major disruptions to the directs the groups is moving towards.

Skills and maintaining skills are only as good as the resources to apply them. Often it has been the case where Aboriginal people had been trained in things they may not have direct relevance to their aspirations and there is no ability to apply these well earned and often well meant training programs. I remember in a forum years ago and elderly Aboriginal man made the point that comment that "he had been on more courses then Greg Norman, yet still no job at the end". Again good planning and policies are the key to this.

Applying skills in the workplace and building safe and sound systems for work plan implementation is critical also. Leadership within the group and building capacity around planning policies and governance is a major component of this implementation.

The planning exercise with the Bana Mindilji Corporation (and as mentioned many other groups) covered many of these aspects. They clearly understand that meeting their aspirations they need to make these key components it is a matter of twining these components together to what meets the need of that particular group. Timing, resources, support and guidance from other stakeholders are the glues that bind it together.

It is the struggle and the way in which these groups deal with these issues that can present some learnings. My hope one day is to be a part of seeing these types of groups succeed and reach and then maintain their directions.

So these blogs are just about covering some areas of interest in the area of Aboriginal land management and cultural heritage. I'm a consultant that works with Aboriginal groups in land and cultural heritage management planning. For more info on me please feel free to visit my webpage www.djarnda.com.au . My aim with blogs will be about covering areas of interest and expressing my views around this.There will be more blogs and opinions offered and more in-depth look at specific issues, trends and developments.Thanks for taking the time to read and hope my opinions are valuable.

Looking after our cultural heritage, some thoughts on mining and heritage.

Earlier this week I read and Australian Geographic article titled "Is mining trampling on Aboriginal culture?". The article raised a number of points and outlined by Indigenous academic Dr Jillian Marsh comments that laws aimed at protecting Indigenous sacred sites where generally toothless.

She goes on further to say that the people who benefit from it are the ones with the knowledge and the information and there rest are left out and disempowered. (Martin 2011).

There is not much with this statement that i don't disagree with. However there are aspects of these statements that i think don't show an understanding of the full picture. I have seen these issues from different sides of the equation, as someone who worked in the mining industry, as someone who worked in government and assessed cultural heritage in terms of development, as an academic studying these points of views, and as a traditional owner.  I'm not writing this to make a judgement call or saying that my views on these issues are more right then wrong but to point out the different aspects.

So starting with the statement that laws aimed at protecting Indigenous heritage are "toothless".

Certainly while there has been some improvement in Queensland by the enacting of the Aboriginal Heritage act 2003. This act replaced the old Cultural Records 1987 Act. My first job in government as an Aboriginal Cultural heritage trainee in the old Department of Environment and Heritage, was to enforce this piece legislation and to manage the listing of Aboriginal sites on the cultural heritage register. At this time much of the identification, assessment, management and final say on the value of heritage was left up to mostly non-Aboriginal Cultural heritage managers. Most of these archaeologist by training.

That was over 20 years ago. Things have changed, Aboriginal people have more of a say in regards to identification, assessment and management of their cultural heritage. For a start the very toothless Cultural records act had been replaced in 2003 by the Aboriginal heritage act. This act is somewhat of an improvement it gives a more inclusive say to Aboriginal people in Qld on the assessment and management of their heritage. And certainly Aboriginal peoples rights and understanding of rights in regards to native title, land and cultural heritage have changed in that time. Within this Aboriginal people questioned their custodianship and owners of their own cultural heritage. Smith (1995) argues that stewardship of the Aboriginal past became and important issue in Aboriginal criticisms about the relevance of archaeological research to Aboriginal people. And the apparent lack of respect afforded to Aboriginal people. She goes on further to outline that "The processual scientific discourse in Australia was both influenced by and influential in the development of cultural heritage as a social and political problem in Australia during the 1960s and 1970s. Archaeological discourse during this period also began to emphasise archaeologist as spokespersons and stewards for 'vanishing' Aboriginal populations and their 'lost' ties to material culture"(Smith:95).

The mining boom had brought these issues out in the public in a major way. While researching for this post i found about forty headlines from different sources that ran along the theme of Aboriginal culture threatened by big miners.

In regards to mining, the debate around cultural heritage has become entwined with the debate around native title an rights to benefits. I have seen in my experience in the mining industry heritage used as a tool of leverage more perceived benefits. What this means is that rights issue is used in the same emotive way over heritage. This does complicate the way heritage is valued. For instance I have seen objectivity of cultural material. Let me provide an example, stone artefact's become so valuable that according to traditional owners that stone reflects everything about their culture even their very existence. Stone artefact's are tangible things that provide evidence of people connection to country. But yet sometimes they are emotively used to as a means of connecting people to country. The importance of the rock is not the rock itself it is the information, the technology used, the fact that it provides evidence of how that country was used. Where the rock is found in the landscape and how it may have got there. All of those pieces of information are valuable. Yet I have seen how that rock has become a symbol of culture. For me it is not the rock that the importance should be placed on. It is the information it provides and how this fits in with the stories of the country, it reinforces the knowledge and it is that knowledge that is the connection to country. Not some rock, but again this is my own personal view.

But there are deeper intrinsic matters that are prevalent in my argument that i will not get into here. Particularly that I have not read enough or understand enough to comment deeper and offer more then my personal opinion. Those intrinsic matters are the fabric of identity and how heritage have ingrained into the politics of Aboriginal affairs.

However back to mining and Aboriginal heritage, yes we are aware of the negatives, heritage being destroyed. Process that some traditional owners maybe feel they have been left out of. Site have been destroyed without consent or even knowledge of traditional owners. But there are mining companies that take cultural heritage serious and are aware of the consequences and impacts upon business. This is one thing that i was not aware of before entering the mining industry. Seeing it from the companies point of view. Mining business take an adverse risk approach to management. If heritage process are not followed then this could potentially mean stop work orders. Stop orders hurt production. Many companies in the industry see it from this point of view. Those that don't soon learn the hard way how this can affect the bottom line. this is not to say that there are still cowboys out there. Or in turn that some company employees may not take it as seriously as their management.

One of the key point I want to outline that has not been mentioned is the fact that mining and exploration activities have increased the archaeological picture in Australia. The benefits to the understanding has been greatly enhanced because of the level of activities that have occurred in remote areas that may not have had any previous or proposed future cultural heritage assessment. Where a farmer who is not required to undertake any cultural heritage study has been replaced by mining companies that are required to consider cultural heritage.

I guess the greatest benefits to Aboriginal people has been the tangible levels of employment that have come out of their activities. In this case I'm talking of the direct employment of Aboriginal traditional owners to identify, record and manage their cultural heritage. I know from experience that these kinds of activities where greatly welcomed by field officers when employed to be out walking on country. They also enjoyed their work and it provided them with access to country. Many that i worked with commented that they felt good working and walking on country. The skills and qualification allowed a number of cultural heritage field officers to pick up jobs on the mine sites in various roles. Professor Langton (2012) outlined in the Australian  this need not be the case and later referred to benefits for indigenous people in the Pilbara where she said some 3000 Aborigines were employed as a direct result of the mining industry.

"Mining companies and indigenous parties have found cause to develop trust arrangements to serve the purpose of local wealth funds," she said.

So while there are negatives it is clearly shown that there had also been employment of Aboriginal people, skills and qualifications gained. 

So these blogs are just about covering some areas of interest in the area of Aboriginal land management and cultural heritage. I'm a consultant that works with Aboriginal groups in land and cultural heritage management planning. For more info on me please feel free to visit my webpage www.djarnda.com.au . My aim with blogs will be about covering areas of interest and expressing my views around this.

There will be more blogs and opinions offered and more in-depth look at specific issues, trends and developments.

Thanks for taking the time to read and hope my opinions are valuable.

References

Is mining trampling on Aboriginal culture? BY LISA MARTIN/AAP WITH AG STAFF |

• APRIL 20, 2011 found at http://www.australiangeographic.com.au/news/2011/04/is-mining-trampling-on-aboriginal-culture/

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/indigenous/marcia-langton-says-3000-aborigines-are-employed-as-a-direct-result-of-the-mining-industry/story-fn9hm1pm-1226529265338

Mikinnon-Dodd Colin 2011 "Indigneous Sacrifice for Miners Gain"

found at http://www.abc.net.au/indigenous/stories/s3274867.htm

Smith, Laura Jane, 1995 Archaeological Theory and The Politics of Cultural Heritage. 

Where is Looking after country at? A quick snapshot of Aboriginal approach to land management today.

On a professional basis I have been involved in looking after country activities for long time. Some 24 years, if i have to offer a time frame. But way before that, my aspirations as a child where always to be employed as some kind of Ranger or land manager, playing a role in looking after my country.

The Barron River which flows through a little town called Kuranda, located in the Cairns hinterland in far north Queensland, was where i spent my formative years. Growing up fishing, swimming camping, on that river gave me a healthy respect for country and the amazing adventures to be had and incredible things to be found. Importantly it also spiked a curiosity for knowledge. Knowledge about my country, the special places, the ecosystems, the flora and fauna and how my people used that country.

This has not changed i still hold these aspiration and still want to be employed in someway that allows me to play a role in looking after country. Whether playing a role in planning or managing natural resource or recoding cultural heritage or the variety of other roles in NRM or natural resource management.

On my father side I'm a descendant of the Djabugay people, I have had the privilege of learning many things about my peoples culture and connection to land. And it is this a value or connection that i know many Aboriginal people all around Australia speak of. They hold that value they same as i do. The connection to country, the aspirations to look after country, the drive to play some role in looking after their country and culture.

Over my twenty something.. years involved in land, natural and cultural resource management i have seen a evolution of what looking after country is about. Many people involved with Aboriginal communities in "looking after country" activities would know that those aspirations i spoke of are near the top of the priority list. However its the evolution i have witness is the involvement of Aboriginal people in a wide range of NRM activities, that i like to cover within this blog.

Particularly i mean that in the early days of my involvement i saw that the priority amongst Aboriginal people was about looking after cultural heritage sites and places of significances. While these are important i think the focus has now shifted to include things such as flora and fauna and special ecosystems.

Like many things, this change has happened gradually and not over night.

There are different reasons for this evolving. I guess Aboriginal people realising themselves that all parts of country and culture are important. The influence from western science and its focus on particular and specific areas of NRM. And indeed the science community engaging more with Aboriginal people and seeing the benefits of Aboriginal knowledge systems, and more importantly the benefits of working with Aboriginal people who are located on country and want to be involved.

This is good this means that the there is a wider range of NRM focus and implementation and as a result of this knowledge and skills grow. In the past we would have had Aboriginal rangers looking after an artefact scatters, now days we have Aboriginal rangers looking after specific species of fauna or involved in research such as turtle nesting and tagging. Conducting surveys of ecosystems, busing country in management of carbon.

This variety in Aboriginal is good and the way of the future. Looking after country should be about this inclusive and broad range approach to NRM. It also needs to be about develop and recognising the broader skill and experiences that are developing amongst Aboriginal Land managers.

So this as the first of my blogs, was just about covering some areas of interest in the area of Aboriginal land management. I'm a consultant that works with Aboriginal groups in land and cultural heritage management planning. For more info on me please feel free to visit my webpage www.djarnda.com.au . My aim with blogs will be about covering areas of interest and expressing my views around this.
There will be more blogs and opinions offered and more in-depth look at specific issues, trends and developments.

Thanks for taking the time to read and hope my opinions are valuable.